With the introduction of the B.Ed program came about the double track system implemented in the various colleges of education, causing significant disruptions with the least said about.
This approach has raised concerns among students, teachers, and education stakeholders, as it not only decreases the number of contact hours but also creates logistical challenges.
This article examines the drawbacks of the double-track system and questions when it will come to an end.
Shortened Semesters:
One of the most noticeable effects of the double track system is the reduction in the duration of semesters. Previously, students used to spend 16 weeks (4 months) in a semester.
However, with the introduction of the double track system, the semester has been cut short to just 14 weeks, and in some cases, as few as 10 weeks. This considerable decrease in time has raised concerns about the quality of education being provided.
Divided Phases:
Under the double track system, the few weeks allocated to a semester are further divided into phases. This means that students have limited contact hours before they are required to leave campus and continue their studies at a later date.
This division disrupts the learning process and hampers the ability of students to maintain a consistent study routine. As a result, students often struggle to grasp concepts effectively, leading to a subpar learning experience.
Financial Burden:
Aside from the academic challenges, the double track system places an additional financial burden on students. Since students are required to vacate their accommodation during the phases when they are not on campus, they must carry their belongings home.
This situation becomes particularly problematic for students residing far from their colleges. For instance, a student from the Northern Region attending college in the Western Region would have to transport their belongings back and forth each phase.
This inconvenience adds unnecessary stress and expense to students’ lives.
Overworked Tutors:
The double track system not only affects students but also puts a strain on the teaching staff.
Tutors in colleges of education are required to teach different batches of students continuously, leaving them with very little rest or time for professional development.
This constant demand on tutors’ time undermines their ability to provide optimal guidance and support to their students.
Overworked tutors also face the risk of burnout, with potential repercussions on their overall performance and morale.
The System, designed to address the issue of limited infrastructure, has inadvertently affected the quality of education and put a strain on the well-being of students and teachers alike.
Students need a consistent and uninterrupted learning experience, while tutors require adequate time for reflection and progression.
See also: The Importance of Taking WASSCE Seriously: A Message to Senior High School Students – Moses Coleman Writes
The implementation of more sustainable solutions and the eventual phasing out of the double-track system should be a priority to restore the integrity and effectiveness of education in colleges of education.
When will the Colleges of Education stop operating the double-track system?